Advancing Breast Cancer Prevention: The α-LA Vaccine

Advancing Breast Cancer Prevention: The α-LA Vaccine

Carina Garcia
June 2025

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and leading cause of death in women globally. Current treatments require multidisciplinary care, allowing for personalized therapies and treatments accounting for certain biomarkers.[3,8] The standard course of treatment for early-stage breast cancer is breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy or mastectomy, and dependent on the case, may also incorporate adjuvant systemic therapy as needed. Further, the treatment for metastatic breast cancer aims to optimize patient’s quality of life and survival.[8] Breast cancer care is continuously evolving with new, innovative preventive care and treatments, many of which are currently in development and undergoing trials. Among the advancements underway, a promising vaccine known as the α-Lactalbumin (α-LA) vaccine has drawn interest for its targeted approach, focusing on a breast-specific protein.[7] This novel approach could pave the way for the future of breast cancer prevention and improve women’s health.

Image by Freepik

What is α-LA?

α-LA is a breast-restricted protein only expressed during lactation, and it serves as a unique marker for breast cancer.[5,6] Notably, studies have shown that the highest α-LA expression levels were found in patients with stage IV breast cancer. These levels are comparable to those found in women in the last trimester of pregnancy and patients with gynecological cancers. Moreover, the level of α-LA in pregnant females were significantly higher than women with benign breast tumours or non-gynecological cancers and for non-pregnant females and males. Additionally, it is crucial to note that the level of α-LA in patients with stage IV breast cancer were significantly higher than patients with stage I-III breast cancer.[6] Given this context, the elevation of α-LA protein in advanced stages of breast cancer makes it a feasible target for a prophylactic cancer vaccination.[5,7] The groundbreaking concept of an α-LA-targeted vaccine strategy builds upon previous research by the Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, which successfully found that the α-LA vaccination completely prevented breast cancer growth in mice at risk for the disease.[4,7] Therefore, further understanding the processes that enable the vaccine to target cancerous cells will provide valuable insights into its potential effectiveness in human patients.

The Inner Workings of the Vaccine 

The α-LA vaccine intends to activate the immune system, forming a protective response against breast cancer cells expressing α-LA.[1] Studies indicate the viability of clinically-inducing a proinflammatory immune response against α-LA.[7] Further, this prophylactic vaccine does not cause any significant inflammation in normal, nonlactating breast tissue, thus minimizing the potential risks of the vaccine.[5] The vaccine also contained an immunologic adjuvant, a drug that enhances the immune response against α-LA to prevent tumor growth.[4]

The α-LA vaccine is an experimental drug not yet approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[2] Recently, Anixa Biosciences, Inc., a biotechnology company, completed a phase-one clinical trial of the α-LA vaccine. This trial focused on individuals who have completed treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) as well as those at high risk for the disease or its recurrence.[1,4] 

The aim of the phase-one trial was to determine the optimal dosage for participants with early-stage TNBC and to enhance the immune response to the vaccine. The study also included cancer-free individuals who are at high risk for developing TNBC or who have chosen to undergo prophylactic mastectomy because they have a high genetic risk for the disease.[4] 

The three cohorts of this trial included: 

  1. Participants with high-risk TNBC.
  2. Participants scheduled for prophylactic mastectomy secondary to genetic risk of TBNC.
  3. Participants that are post-TBNC treatment and are receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab.[2]

TNBC is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, accounting for 12% to 15% of all breast cancer cases, with a mortality rate of about 25% within five years of diagnosis. At present, the only reliable preventive measure for those at high risk for TNBC is undergoing a mastectomy. Thus, the development of the α-LA vaccine represents a significant step towards alternative preventative care for those affected by or at risk for TNBC.[4]

Optimism at a Professional Level

“We believe we have made significant progress in the development of this vaccine, having recently completed enrollment in the Phase 1 clinical trial. We look forward to the next stage of development and are optimistic about the impact this vaccine could have in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer,” said Amit Kumar, Ph.D, CEO of Anixa Biosciences, Inc.[1] 

The innovative vaccine strategy of the α-LA vaccine inspires a hopeful outlook for the future, where scientific advancements can yield transformative solutions for women’s health.

“Long term, we are hoping that this can be a true preventive vaccine that would be administered to cancer-free individuals to prevent them from developing this highly aggressive disease,” says oncologist Dr. G. Thomas Budd in a statement to the Cleveland Clinic.[4] 


My Body, My Data: A Federal Shift in Reproductive Privacy as of June 2025 

My Body, My Data: A Federal Shift in Reproductive Privacy as of June 2025 

Sanya Talwar 
June 2025

Congress Reboots Protection with “My Body, My Data” 

On June 11, 2025, U.S. Representatives and Senators introduced the My Body, My Data Act, sponsored by Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA) and Senators Mazoe Hirono (D-HI) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), with the aim to create federal guardrails around reproductive health data —including menstruation, contraception, IVF, pregnancy, and abortion records— by limiting how companies collect, store, and share it.[1] The legislation would require informed user consent, strong data deletion options, and harsh penalties for misuse.[2] 

Digital Trials, Real-World Consequences 

This renewed push follows documented misuse of digital data. In a 2022 Nebraska case, Facebook messages between a mother and daughter were used as evidence in an illegal abortion prosecution.[3] In Texas, prosecutors used license-plate readers to identify people visiting abortion clinics. Anti-abortion activists have geofenced Planned Parenthood clinics, delivering targeted digital ads to visitors.[4] 

This isn’t just invasive—it’s dangerous. Experts warn that without regulation, reproductive health data can and is being used to criminalize people for seeking care. 

What the Bill Actually Does 

The Bill proposes: 

  • Data minimization: Companies can only collect data necessary for delivering requested services.
  • Consent-Driven access: Users must explicitly agree to data use and can demand deletion
  • Transparency: Platforms must disclose data practices clearly.
  • Enforcement: Companies violating the law could be fined up to $1000 per user per day.[2] 

These protections mirror Washington State’s 2023 My Health, My Data Act, which has become a model for reproductive digital privacy law nationwide.[5] 

Backers Weigh In 

Reproductive rights groups have endorsed the legislation. Mini Timmaraju, president of Reproductive Freedom for All, emphasized the stakes: “No one should fear that their period app or search history could be used against them in court”[1] 

Dr. Dhazaleh Moayedi, an OB-GYN, stressed that patients’ safety depends on privacy: “We cannot provide ethical care if our patients are at legal risk for seeking help.”[6] 

Even tech experts are speaking out. Mozilla Foundation warned in 2024 that 87% of health apps lack proper user protections.[7] 

Parallel Bill Targets Law Enforcement 

In May 2025, five House Democrats introduced a complementary bill: the Reproductive Data Privacy and Protection Act, which would block law enforcement from accessing reproductive data in civil or criminal investigations, including fertility treatment, miscarriage records, and abortion communications.[8] 

Why This Matters Right Now 

  • A 2025 academic review of 45 health apps found that most apps transmitted user data to third-party marketers or analytics firms, often without full user consent.[7] 
  • States like New York, Connecticut, and California have been passing their own data shield laws to counter federal inaction.[5] 
  • Without federal legislation, people in anti-abortion states remain exposed to potential criminalization through digital footprints.[4] 

A New Era of Advocacy 

My Body, My Data reframed reproductive justice in the digital age. It acknowledges that the post-Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization reality extends beyond clinics and courtrooms—it reaches into browsers, apps, and smart devices. Protecting personal data is now a fundamental part of defining bodily autonomy. 

This legislation, if passed, would be the most comprehensive federal privacy protection for reproductive data in American history. As of now, the bill has been introduced but has not yet passed. Lawmakers expect debates and committee reviews over the summer, with a potential floor vote anticipated in the fall session of Congress. Advocates are urging swift action given the urgency of reproductive data vulnerabilities nationwide. And even if it fails in the short term, the momentum for digital rights is building state by state—and person by person.

At its core, this debate is about basic human rights—the right of every woman to control her body and her health information without fear or interference. Reproductive data privacy should not be negotiable—it must be a federally protected right. 


The Pink Tax: The Hidden Cost of Being a Woman

The Pink Tax: The Hidden Cost of Being a Woman

Manushree Kanchi
June 2025

Even though it may sound like a government-imposed fee, the “Pink Tax” is not an actual tax. Instead, it describes the overpricing of products and services marketed solely towards women. This “tax” encompasses a wide range of items from drugstore to professional. Women are often faced paying more than men for the same items with the only difference being the color of packaging or the gender label. It is disparities like these that quietly add up over time to contribute to the expensive cost of being a woman.

Image by Freepik

In Everyday Life

A 2015 study by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs studied an estimate of 800 products. The conclusion found that women’s products cost an average of 7% more than similar items that are marketed to men. The study also showed that there was a 13% upcharge on personal care products and even a 7% price difference for children’s items. Neutrally categorized items such as razors and lotions are usually priced higher for women. They are often packaged in pink and labeled “for her”. [1]

Not only do products reflect this gendered pricing, but services do as well. For example, the dry cleaners may charge more to clean a woman’s blouse than a man’s shirt, even when the materials are nearly identical. Haircuts for women tend to be more expensive than men’s, regardless of hair length. These patterns in pricing are integrated so deeply into everyday life that most people don’t even question them. However, these common occurrences do accumulate quickly and over the course of a year, can cost women over $1,300 more than men. [2]

Compounding the Wage Gap

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, women earn about 83 cents for every dollar a man earns. For women of color, the gap is even wider. Overall, women are often spending more while earning less. [3]

Critics of the term “Pink Tax” sometimes argue that women can just buy men’s products to avoid the markup of their own. While this is true, this dismisses the real issue at hand. Many women feel pressure to use products marketed specifically for them to meet societal standards of appearance or femininity. Some essential items like menstrual products have no male equivalent at all. In many U.S. states, feminine hygiene products have been taxed as luxury items. 

Legal Action & What Comes Next

There are some states that have taken steps towards addressing the issue. In 2022, California passed the Gender Tax Repeal Act, which prohibits businesses from charging different prices for “substantially similar” goods based on gender. [4] While there are a couple states with legislation like this in place, efforts to pass a federal Pink Tax Repeal Act have been stalled, leaving many American consumers unprotected from gender-based pricing.

Ending the Pink Tax isn’t just about lowering prices of personal products or services. It’s about economic fairness and gender equity. While women pay more when they earn less, society silently penalizes them for their gender. Advocates and lawmakers must continue pushing for change to ensure pricing becomes fair and truly equal.


Cervical Cancer and HPV: A Preventable Disease

Cervical Cancer and HPV: A Preventable Disease

Ali A. Lateef
June 2025

While breast cancer is linked to a number of genetic and environmental factors, cervical cancer is overwhelmingly a virus-linked condition. Specifically, the human papillomavirus (HPV) is responsible for 95% of cervical malignancies.[7]  It is this link between HPV and cervical cancer that makes eliminating the latter a possibility by controlling and eradicating the former.

Image by Freepik

Overview

HPV is not one entity, but instead a group of variant yet similar pathogens. It is linked to many types of cancer in addition to cervical cancer such as vulvar, vaginal, anorectal, oropharyngeal, and penile cancers.

Most infections with HPV are effectively handled by the immune system without any long-term issues and often without the person knowing they were even infected because of a lack of symptoms. If, however, it does persist, and it’s one of the cancer-causing (oncogenic) types, then it becomes a source of concern.

In symptomatic infections with certain HPV types, warts start developing in various areas including the hands and feet, mouth and face, and/or the anal and genital areas, resolving on their own in a matter of 1-2 years. These wart-causing types are not connected to cancers, and the oncogenic types usually cause completely silent infections.

After 15-20 years of infection with an oncogenic type, cancerous development could be seen in the cervix. Early stages are often asymptomatic and only when there’s been significant growth can cancer symptoms usually be seen.[5]

The Lived Experience

Cervical cancer takes decades to develop, and symptoms can take time to appear, so for most patients hearing the news that they’ve got cancer is often a blindsiding experience, and they have little time to fully digest the news as they must hastily decide upon a treatment plan.

When they arise, symptoms include abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge (post-menopause, between periods, after sex, or heavier/longer than usual), pelvic pain, and in more progressive disease swelling of the legs and urinary or bowel issues.[2]

Within weeks, a person can go from believing themself to be completely healthy to possibly preparing to undergo surgery that may approach a radical hysterectomy.

Chemotherapy, radiation, and brachytherapy (internal radiation) can cause a host of side effects: nausea and vomiting, fatigue, anxiety, skin issues, bowel and urinary issues, and loss of appetite/weight, with the whole experience being physically tiring and emotionally draining.

Throughout this journey, support from friends and family provides a lifeline for many patients to not lose themselves in worry and doubt, and support from their partners can help maintain the connection of intimacy between them.[1]

Prevention, Protection, Treatment

The principal method of HPV control is vaccination, with the American CDC recommending routine vaccination at 11-12 years of age.

The vaccine currently used in the USA is the 9-valent Gardasil®, meaning that it protects against 9 HPV types, most notable among them are types 16 and 18 which alone cause 66% of cervical cancers. Overall, the types covered by the vaccine account for about 81% of all cervical cancer cases.[6]

Practicing safe sex has some efficacy in protecting against HPV, although condoms don’t offer full skin protection and a significant percentage of the sexually active population is infected at any given time, so the main prevention strategy remains vaccination, accompanied with safe sex and limiting the number of sexual partners.[4]

If someone gets infected with HPV, there’s currently no cure for it, but that may change in the future as a new vaccine, Vvax001, is being tested as a potential treatment for type 16 positive patients with premalignant developments in their cervix.[3] Findings from its phase 2 trial were published in March of this year, so there’s still more testing to be done before it becomes available.

Conclusion

While HPV has a tendency towards malignancy, the process occurs at a very slow rate making the development of cancers span decades.

Cervical cancer symptoms can take time to arise, and when they do arise they’re sometimes confused for other conditions which delays proper diagnosis and treatment, making routine Pap smears essential for accurate early diagnoses.

By educating ourselves and future generations about how we can protect ourselves from this disease, sharing the stories of survivors, promoting vaccination, and attending regular screenings, we can become one of the last generations to ever suffer from this disease.


Pomegranates, A Woman’s Fruit?

Pomegranates, A Woman’s Fruit?

Harika Maganti
June 2025

Originating in the Middle East and northern India, and grown widely across central/south Asia and the Mediterranean, pomegranates have always been a trendy fruit, and while they have been prized for centuries in many cultures around the world for their alleged health benefits (specifically for women), do these claims hold up when viewed under our modern day scientific lens?

Image by Freepik

Nutritional Profile

Pomegranates consist mostly of water, and are a good source of fiber, vitamin K, vitamin C, folate, potassium, and antioxidants. There are numerous phytochemicals and flavanoids in both the seeds (arils) as well as the peel. The deep red of the juice comes from anthocyanins, and if the name sounds familiar it’s because that’s the same compound found in blueberries. An oil can be made from the seeds, and the oil is particularly rich in fatty acids like punic acid, and tannins like punicalagin and punicalin.[4] 

Health Benefits

Pomegranates have potent anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties, there are nearly 122 phytochemicals found in the fruit![3]  It is safe to say their Punic acid, (found only in pomegranates) has potential anti-cancer properties as well as being heart-healthy.[4]  Ellagic acid, also known as ellagitannins, can slow the growth of cancer cells, and also directly stop the biochemical inflammatory pathways. Essential oils from the fruit contain anti-microbial, and even insect repelling properties.[1]   

Effects on Women

But how can this fruit help women? Menopause and perimenopause are times in a woman’s life where she undergoes many physical, mental, and emotional changes. Pomegranate extracts can help reduce symptoms like night-sweats, and hot flashes, and may even help with bone problems common to the menopausal age group like osteoporosis.[1]  Research is starting to show that pomegranates can work to keep the hormones in balance, specifically estrogen.[1] These characteristics also make them useful for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, the polyphenols of pomegranates are anti-androgenic.[1] Studies show that the juice of the fruit was even able to reverse changes to the endometrial lining caused by polycystic ovarian syndrome.[1] As we discussed earlier, pomegranates have anti-cancer properties, and research is starting to show that the fruit is especially effective against breast cancer.[1] Specifically they can help to stop the conversion of androgen to estrogen, which helps to prevent the development and spread of affected breast cells, the ellagatannins and punic acid are especially effective.[1]   

Conclusion

Pomegranates have so many special components, that it’s possible that there are still many more undiscovered health benefits. The fruit has always been linked to the fairer sex throughout history, from its association with various Greek and Mesopatmian goddesses to the Virgin Mary by many renaissance painters, the blood-red seeds are a visual metaphor for life, fertility, and motherhood in many cultures around the world.[2]  So for women, perhaps a pomegranate a day may truly keep the doctors away.   


Eunice Foote: A Scientist Written Out of History 

Eunice Foote: A Scientist Written Out of History 

Harshitha Chaganti 
March 2025

Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, Galileo Galilei, and Marie Curie are the names that often come to mind when we think of great scientists, yet only one of them is a woman. Throughout history, countless women have made groundbreaking scientific discoveries, only to have their contributions overlooked or credited to men. One such scientist is Eunice Newton Foote, a pioneering researcher whose work on the greenhouse effect predated some of the most well-known climate science, yet for years her name remained in the shadows of history.

Image by Freepik

Eunice Newton Foote was born on July 17, 1819 in Goshen, Connecticut. She pursued her education at the Troy Female Seminary (now Emma Willard School), an institution famous for its progressive approach to women’s education during the era. There, she developed an interest in scientific subjects, laying the groundwork for her future experiments.

In 1856, Foote conducted experiments to understand the warming effect of various different atmospheric gases. Using household items, glass cylinders, thermometers, and an air pump, she measured how gases carbon dioxide (then known as “carbonic acid gas”) and water vapor absorbed heat when exposed to sunlight. Her findings were groundbreaking: 

  • Carbon Dioxide’s Heat Absorption: Foote observed that carbon dioxide absorbed more heat and retained it longer than other gases, leading her to conclude that an atmosphere rich in this gas would elevate Earth’s temperature. 
  • Implications for Climate: She hypothesized that variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels could have contributed to historical climate changes, suggesting that higher concentrations would result in a warmer planet. 

Foote’s work predated the more widely recognized experiments of John Tyndall by three years, yet her contributions remained largely unrecognized during her lifetime. Had her research received the attention it deserved, discussions about climate change might have begun much earlier, potentially influencing policies and scientific advancements that could have helped mitigate global warming before it became a crisis.

Despite the significance of her research, Foote faced societal barriers typical of the 19th century. As a woman, she was not permitted to present her findings at the 1856 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Instead, Professor Joseph Henry of the Smithsonian Institution presented her paper, acknowledging the limitations placed on women in science at the time.

Foote’s work was subsequently overshadowed, and her name faded into obscurity. It wasn’t until recent decades that historians and scientists revisited her experiments, recognizing her as a pioneer in climate science. In 2019, on the 200th anniversary of her birth, NOAA celebrated her contributions, shedding light on her role in early climate studies.

Eunice Newton Foote’s story is a testament to the challenges women in science have historically faced and the importance of acknowledging their contributions. Her experiments laid the foundation for our understanding of the greenhouse effect and climate change. Today, as we grapple with global warming, Foote’s early insights serve as a reminder of the critical need for diverse voices in scientific discourse.

By bringing Eunice Foote’s legacy to the forefront, we not only honor her achievements but also inspire future generations of women scientists to pursue their passions, undeterred by the biases of their time.


A Deadly Glow: The Case of the Radium Girls

A Deadly Glow: The Case of the Radium Girls

Tanvir Bhamra
March 2025

Let’s set the scene:

it’s the early 1920s, the world is still at war, and industries are booming, including one that promised an ethereal glow with a brand new material–radium. Recently discovered by Marie Curie and her husband Pierre in 1898, it was quickly implemented into everyday items in society. The miracle element produced a glow that was seen as an opportunity to evolve the dials on clocks and watches, a paint mixture containing zinc sulphide and radium was made to make the hands and numbers visible in the dark. And who was responsible for applying this glow-in-the-dark magic? Young, working-class women, unaware that the very paint they handled would slowly poison them.[2]

Image by Freepik

They were employed at factories like the United States Radium Corporation (USRC), sitting in rows, carefully painting tiny numbers on the dials. At the same time, they were encouraged to practice “lip-pointing,” a technique where the tip of the paintbrush was pressed against their lips to keep the strokes fine and precise. The process would often involve the women ingesting a little of the radium-infused paint, and when concerns were brought to their supervisors about the side effects, they were met with claims of it being harmless and even beneficial to health.[2] This is something the vast majority thought as well. A small amount of radium was believed to be a miracle medicine, having been used in commercial products like facial creams and water.[1]

Radium, like all radioactive elements, emits ionizing radiation–an invisible force that can wreak havoc on the human body at a cellular level. When the Radium Girls ingested tiny amounts of radium daily through the instructed technique, the substance didn’t just pass through their bodies–it became part of them.[2] Radium behaves similarly to calcium, with the body mistaking the two and absorbing it into the bones, slowly destroying tissue from the inside out. The results were horrifying: necrosis of the jaw (deterioration of jaw bones), anemia, and cancers.[1] Even Marie Curie, the scientist who discovered radium, fell victim to its deadly effects, dying from aplastic anemia (lack of new blood cells being produced), a condition caused by prolonged exposure to radiation. At the time, little was understood about the dangers of radiation, but the tragic deaths of the Radium Girls helped expose its devastating impact. 

One by one, the girls started showing symptoms and falling sick. First, it was the teeth–painfully crumbling and falling out. This was followed by aching bones, mysterious tumors, and deteriorating bodies. The USRC had known prior, maybe not to the full extent, but they at least knew radium was dangerous and had even warned their male scientists to wear protective gear while the women were left in the dark, with the only remaining light source coming from their own bodies.[3] 

In 1922, Amelia (Mollie) Maggia, one of the first known victims of radium poisoning, suffered a horrific and mysterious illness that began with a toothache and quickly escalated into agonizing ulcers, bone decay, and excruciating pain. Her jaw had even fallen into her dentist’s hands with no tools needed. By September, the relentless disease had spread to her throat, causing her to die at the mere young age of 24. Her death was falsely labeled as syphilis, a misdiagnosis the company later used to discredit the growing concerns about radium’s dangers. Meanwhile, more of her colleagues including Grace Fryer were beginning to suffer similar symptoms, but their employer, the USRC, refused to take responsibility, even going as far as to fund studies that denied any link between their work and deteriorating health.[3]

Despite being dismissed and ignored, the women fought back, determined to hold the company accountable. Grace Fryer led the legal battle, securing a lawyer after years of rejections, but the statute of limitations and lack of legal recognition for radium poisoning made the case an uphill climb.[3] Eventually, in 1927, the women settled out of court, but their story gained national attention, inspiring another group of dial painters in Illinois, led by Catherine Wolfe Donohue, to continue the fight. Even as she wasted away from a massive tumor, Donohue testified from her deathbed in 1938 ultimately winning justice and helping to establish workplace safety laws that still protect workers today.[1] The Radium Girls’ suffering was immeasurable, but their bravery changed labor rights forever; Their legacy serves as a powerful reminder that perseverance and courage can ignite lasting change, ensuring safer workplaces for future generations.  


The Luteal Lowdown: Hormones, Mood, and the Science of Cycles

The Luteal Lowdown: Hormones, Mood, and the Science of Cycles

Asmita Adya
March 2025

The time between ovulation and menstruation, known as the luteal phase, is often marked by emotional variability and instability in menstruating individuals. Feelings of negative affect, physical discomfort, and general malaise commonly plague individuals as the uterine lining thickens in preparation for pregnancy or, if fertilization does not occur, menstruation.

Image by Freepik

The Biological Basis

During ovulation, the hypothalamus secretes a surge of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) to the pituitary gland. In response, the anterior pituitary gland releases luteinizing hormone (LH), which stimulates the gonads, leading to the luteal phase. During this phase, progesterone reaches its peak concentration. Prior to this, during the follicular phase, the anterior pituitary secretes follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which leads to a peak in estradiol levels. Estrogen, an ovarian hormone critical to well-being, plays a key role in mood regulation. Low estrogen levels have been implicated in increased vulnerability to depression and impaired emotional regulation. Thus, during the luteal phase, when estrogen levels decline, studies have shown that women exhibit more frequent negative affect and a heightened stress response [1]. Additionally, estradiol contributes to reward processing, as it has a stimulatory, activational effect and interacts with dopamine [2].

However, this raises the question: does the likelihood of experiencing negative affect stem solely from decreased estrogen, or does progesterone itself play a direct role? The lack of conclusive clinical evidence remains a significant barrier to answering this question.

The Implications of Hormonal Contraceptives

Hormonal contraceptives and their effects may serve as a clue. In the 1960s, ‘the pill’ revolutionized hormonal contraception in the United States. The pill typically contains ethinyl estradiol or mestranol (synthetic estrogen) and progestin (synthetic progesterone), though some formulations are progestin-only. The androgenic properties of different progestins vary, ranging from strongly anti-androgenic to strongly androgenic. The typical dose ranges from 0.1 to 3.0 mg per pill.

Although the exact mechanism of action is not fully understood, hormonal contraceptives are thought to “mimic pregnancy.” During pregnancy, endogenous estrogen and progesterone levels rise, exerting negative feedback on hypothalamic GnRH secretion. Similarly, contraceptives prevent pregnancy by mimicking these negative feedback effects. Exogenous hormones from the pill inhibit GnRH release, thereby suppressing FSH and LH secretion from the anterior pituitary. As a result, follicular development is inhibited due to reduced FSH, and ovulation does not occur due to the absence of an LH surge. While the extent of hormonal suppression varies by contraceptive formulation, this chronic suppression prevents pregnancy. Women using hormonal contraceptives typically have endogenous hormone concentrations equivalent to or lower than those observed in the early follicular phase of naturally cycling women. Although hormone levels usually return to baseline within months after discontinuation, some studies suggest lower levels persist for years [3].

Why does this matter? Women who use hormonal contraceptives often report negative side effects such as mood changes, diminished libido, and exacerbation of underlying psychiatric conditions [4]. Furthermore, contraceptives have been implicated in structural and functional changes in brain regions involved in affective and reward processing [5]. These effects highlight the profound impact of exogenous hormone manipulation. Since many contraceptive methods rely on progestin as a primary component, it is plausible that progesterone plays a key role in negative affect, though further research is needed to establish a definitive correlation.

Plausible Physical and Mental Effects

Possible physical and mental effects of elevated progesterone include fatigue, negative affect, and mood fluctuations [6]. These effects can impair emotional and physical functioning and exacerbate underlying psychiatric conditions. These hormonal fluctuations occur independently of individual control; menstruation follows its cyclical course, only ceasing at menopause. So, never dismiss a woman as “too hormonal”—she is simply functioning as nature intended.


Exercise Arises as a Key Strategy to Reduce Falls in Polypharmacy for Elderly Women 

Exercise Arises as a Key Strategy to Reduce Falls in Polypharmacy for Elderly Women 

Steven Shin
March 2025

Among the elderly, a condition known as polypharmacy became one of the most significant public health concerns. Recent research by the University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital has highlighted the effectiveness of structured exercise in reducing fall risks in elderly women.[3] The study underscores the importance of incorporating physical activity into healthcare strategies aimed at fall prevention. 

The Impact of Polypharmacy on Physical Function 

Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of four or more medications, has been linked to deteriorating physical fitness and an increased risk of falls.[3] As older adults frequently require multiple medications to manage chronic conditions, this association is concerning. However, while previous studies have suggested a direct correlation between polypharmacy and higher fall risks, the recent findings challenge this notion by demonstrating that targeted exercise programs can mitigate these risks.[2] 

Image by Freepik

The Kuopio Fall Prevention Study: A Game-Changer 

The study analyzed data from the Kuopio Fall Prevention Study, a randomized controlled trial involving 914 women with a median age of 76.5 years. Participants were randomly assigned to either an exercise group or a control group. The exercise program consisted of twice-weekly guided exercise sessions, including tai chi and circuit training, for the first six months. Afterward, participants were granted free access to the city’s recreational sports facilities for an additional six months.[3] Fitness assessments were conducted at baseline, one year, and two years into the study. Medication use was tracked through self-reported questionnaires, and falls were monitored for approximately two years via biweekly SMS queries.[3] 

The results of the study were compelling. Among participants with polypharmacy, those engaged in the exercise intervention exhibited a 29% lower risk of falls compared to the control group taking zero to one medications.[1] Additionally, while 1,380 falls were recorded during the study period—739 of which resulted in injury or pain and 63 in fractures—polypharmacy did not increase the likelihood of falls in the control group.[3] Moreover, fitness tests revealed that participants using zero to one medications generally performed better than those with polypharmacy. However, individuals with the poorest physical fitness at the outset of the study

benefited the most from the intervention.[2] This finding suggests that physical activity can significantly enhance functional ability, even among those with limited mobility. 

Patient Outcomes and Future Directions 

The study’s findings reinforce the need to integrate structured exercise programs into standard geriatric care. Healthcare professionals should actively encourage physical activity, particularly for elderly patients managing multiple medications. The benefits of tai chi and circuit training extend beyond fall prevention; they contribute to improved balance, strength, and overall quality of life.[4] 

Additionally, previous research has linked polypharmacy to reduced physical function, further emphasizing the importance of targeted exercise interventions. For example, a systematic review  found a reciprocal relationship between polypharmacy and diminished physical performance in older adults. Similarly, findings from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development indicated that polypharmacy at ages 60 to 69 was associated with poorer cognitive and physical capabilities, even when accounting for chronic disease burden.[1] 

Given the significant benefits demonstrated by the Kuopio Fall Prevention Study, exercise should be a cornerstone of fall prevention strategies for elderly individuals, particularly those with polypharmacy. Encouraging participation in structured physical activity programs may not only reduce fall risk but also enhance overall physical well-being. Future research should continue exploring how tailored interventions can further optimize outcomes for older adults managing multiple medications. 


Closing the Wealth Gap: How Women Are Reshaping the Investment World 

Closing the Wealth Gap: How Women Are Reshaping the Investment World 

Shriya Parvatikar 
March 2025

For decades, investing has been seen as something men do — whether it is leading a big financial firm, managing investment portfolios, or even trading stocks. Women have been constantly underrepresented in the stock market and wealth-building opportunities. However, in recent years, there has been a massive shift as more women take charge of their financial futures and challenge the traditional hurdle in the investment world. These developments not only serve as significant steps in mitigating the gender gap but also prove that financial independence is not only a goal — it’s a necessity. 

Image by Freepik

The Persistent Gender Investing Gap 

The gender investing gap still hugely persists. According to a 2018 study held in the UK, the total value of the investments that women (aged 21-53) saved was half the amount that their male counterparts had saved [1]. This is a huge gap in investments considering the fact that on average, women live longer than men, yet they usually retire with less wealth which puts them at a higher risk of financial insecurity in the later parts of their age. A 2021 Women and Investing report from Fidelity Investments states that even though women’s investment portfolios often outperform men’s, only 33% of women see themselves as investors [2]. Why is that? Some of the possible rationale are: lower financial confidence, the gender pay gap, and a lack of representation in financial education. 

Moreover, women have significantly less shares than their male counterparts. According to a 2022 report, male executives own 99 times more shares in S&P 500 companies than their female counterparts [3]. This is alarming since women make up a quarter of C-Suite leadership in the firms. In addition to that, women tend to have investment account balances that are 44% lower than men’s, as reported by The Motley Fool [4]. This is not just a mere matter of investing, it is about long-term wealth, financial security, and making sure women have the same opportunities to build a sustainable and independent financial life. 

Flipping the Script of the Investment World 

Good News! This gap is slowly and gradually closing as more financial tools and platforms are developing to help women all over the world to be able to invest confidently. 

These platforms include the following:

– Companies such as Ellevest are specifically designed to help women build on their wealth by offering financial planning services and wealth management. 

– More firms such as BBG Ventures and BRAVA are supporting female entrepreneurs and allocating money to businesses that support women’s empowerment.  

– The increase in financial literacy programs such as Female Invest is helping educate women about money, making investing more widespread and accessible. 

In addition to these developments, the number of women investing in the stock market has significantly improved. The Motley Fool further states that 71% of women are now investing in the stock market, a notable rise driven by the younger generations [4]. Additionally, as more women have started investing, studies have started to prove that women investors often achieve better returns than men. For instance, a 2024 analysis report by The Fintech Times emphasized that Australian women outperformed men by 4%. Women are also more likely to focus on being sustainable and socially responsible while investing, and promoting ethical business practices [5]

This notable progress can be further accelerated through these initiatives: 

  • Promoting financial education in rural places in which women are obliged to stick to the social/traditional norms. This can amplify the number of women investing and guarantee a better future for themselves. 
  • Closing the prevalent wage cap can address income disparity and eliminate blockages that are stopping women from investing. This way, they can gain more capital to support their investment. 
  • Encouraging more women into leadership roles in finance can inspire others to participate and support. 

As more women take charge of their financial lives, they not only secure a stable future for themselves but also challenge the traditional stereotypes that decide what women can and cannot do. The rise of investors is more than just a trend, it is a huge step that is reshaping the financial world for the better.