A Natural Process and A Leading Cause of Maternal Mortality Worldwide 

A Natural Process and A Leading Cause of Maternal Mortality Worldwide 

Isha Gupta

July 2024

The birth of a baby is often a tremendously joyous occasion as parents welcome a new member to their family. Pregnancy and childbirth are accompanied by drastic changes to physical and mental health. Even after their baby is born, women can experience health effects as their bodies adjust to the postpartum period. A common experience is postpartum bleeding, also referred to as lochia.[1] New mothers experience bleeding from the vagina after childbirth due to shedding and restoration of the womb lining.[2] Experiencing some bleeding is a normal part of the postpartum period. However, excessive blood loss, also referred to as postpartum hemorrhage, is a critical maternal health concern to be aware of, given that it is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide.[3] 

Women may experience postpartum bleeding regardless of if they had a vaginal delivery or Cesarean section.[2] Postpartum bleeding can last a few weeks.[1] The bleeding could temporarily get heavier and be accompanied by cramps, particularly during breastfeeding, due to the related uterine contractions.[1, 2] 

Image by freepik

Hospital and postpartum pads help effectively manage heavier bleeding, and women can use menstrual pads as their bleeding subsides.[2] Also, women who gave birth vaginally could potentially consider creating and using padsicles, an innovative term for chilled or frozen sanitary pads. Padsicles could help them reduce pain, swelling, and bruising, while simultaneously, managing bleeding and promoting healing.[4] New mothers are advised to refrain from using tampons and menstrual cups, until they have their postnatal checkup and their healthcare provider approves, in case there are wounds, tears, or cuts around the vagina, and to prevent infection while the body is healing.[1, 2] 

Women should promptly seek a medical professional if they lose so much blood that they have to change their pad in less than an hour, and if the bleeding does not subside over time.[2] Also, profuse large blood clots could be a sign of the uterus having difficulty shrinking back to its original size.[2] Additionally, women experiencing postpartum bleeding should seek medical attention if they experience dizziness, irregular heartbeat, or signs of infection such as fever and chills.[2] 

Postpartum hemorrhage is characterized by blood loss of 500 mL or more.[3] Postpartum hemorrhage usually occurs within 24 hours after childbirth.[5] However, it can also occur up to 12 weeks after birth.[5] Therefore, it is very important for new mothers to be aware of the signs and monitor their blood loss, in order to prevent adverse outcomes including death. Along with persistent and excessive bleeding, postpartum hemorrhage can be accompanied by symptoms of decreased blood pressure such as blurred vision, dizziness, or feeling faint.[5] Other signs of postpartum hemorrhage include pale skin, nausea, vomiting, and worsening abdominal or pelvic pain.[5] A common method that medical professionals determine the amount of blood loss among new mothers is by weighing their blood-soaked pads.[5] Additional diagnostic tests for postpartum hemorrhage include blood tests to measure red blood cells and clotting factors as well as ultrasounds of the uterus and related organs.[5] 

One of the most common causes of postpartum hemorrhage is a soft and weak uterus, referred to as uterine atony.[5] Another common cause is uterine trauma, which can occur due to damage caused to the uterus, cervix, vagina, or perineum during childbirth.[5] The use of medical tools such as forceps and vacuum extraction during childbirth can increase women’s risk of uterine trauma.[5] Postpartum hemorrhage can also occur when the entire placenta does not separate from the wall of the uterus, referred to as retained placental tissue.[5]In addition, postpartum hemorrhage can occur in women who have coagulation disorders or conditions like eclampsia, because they can interfere with their body’s clotting ability.[5] Diverse factors can influence the risk of postpartum hemorrhage, including having more than one baby simultaneously, giving birth to a large baby, prolonged labor, and older maternal age.[5] 

There are diverse ways postpartum hemorrhage could be treated. Each woman should be given a personalized treatment plan based on her personal root cause and the particular amount of blood she has lost. For instance, if postpartum hemorrhage is caused by uterine atony, then specific medications such as oxytocin or prostaglandins like misoprostol could help induce contractions.[5] Other ways postpartum hemorrhage is treated include uterine massages to help uterine muscles contract, removing retained placental tissue, and repairing tears or lacerations on the vagina, cervix, or uterus.[5] Additionally, the uterus could be packed with sterile gauze.[5] Moreover, a balloon could be utilized to put pressure on uterine walls.[5]In rare cases, a surgeon might need to make an incision in a woman’s abdomen to effectively determine the source of her postpartum hemorrhage, known as laparotomy, or surgically remove her womb, known as hysterectomy.[5] Furthermore, women suffering from postpartum hemorrhage may need blood transfusions to replenish the blood lost.[5] 

Postpartum hemorrhage could be a painful and even traumatic experience for new mothers and it could be a stressful experience for their loved ones.[3] Furthermore, in many communities around the world, bleeding during and after childbirth is considered impure and to be caused by evil spirits, similar to stigmas surrounding menstrual bleeding.[3] Negative socio-cultural perceptions and taboos could influence delays in seeking medical attention, especially since women and their community members may end up ignoring excessive blood loss until new mothers become unconscious.[3] Combating misinformation and raising awareness of both natural postpartum bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage is crucial for improving new mothers’ health and well-being. Early detection and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage helps lead to healthier outcomes and save women’s lives.[5] 

Postpartum bleeding is a common experience among new mothers. Nevertheless, it is essential to effectively understand and distinguish normal postpartum blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage.[6]It is important for women to feel safe and comfortable sharing concerns about their health after childbirth so that serious maternal health concerns like postpartum hemorrhage can be addressed efficiently. 


How the First Woman Elected as Mexico’s President May Change the Economic Future for Mexican Women

How the First Woman Elected as Mexico’s President May Change the Economic Future for Mexican Women

Gabriela Castro
June 2024

Mexico held its general election on June 2nd, 2024.[4] The election included voting for the next candidate to hold office for the six-year presidential term following the term of current Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO for short).[4] It was announced that Gloria Sheinbaum of Mexico’s left-wing National Regeneration Movement (Movimiento Regeneración Nacional or MORENA in Spanish) political party won in a landslide, holding about 59.5% of citizens’ votes.[10][1]

In addition to being the first woman elected as Mexico’s president, Sheinbaum holds the highest number of votes in the country’s presidential election history (35.9 million), exceeding current President Obrador’s record of 30.1 million votes in 2018.[1] 

Sheinbaum has built her campaign on a myriad of pledges which she has outlined in her agenda,“100 Steps for Transformation.”[13] Many of these pledges are a continuation of AMLO’s political focus, but Sheinbaum is also notably focused on furthering social and economic progress not attributable to her predecessor.[8][13] What exactly are the specifics of these policy changes and how could they change the status quo and economic stability for women?

Image by freepik

Raising the Minimum Wage

During his presidency, AMLO has set forth policies to increase minimum wage.[15] He established a minimum wage of 88 pesos (5 US dollars) per day in 2018 with a goal of reaching a minimum wage of 15 USD by the end of his term in 2024.[15] As of 2024, the general minimum wage in Mexico is 248.93 pesos per day (13.48 US dollars) and the minimum wage in the nation’s northern border is 375 pesos per day (20.31 US dollars).[14][5] 

Sheinbaum has outlined plans to continue to raise the minimum wage by 11% annually during her term as president.[13] This means that by 2030, Mexico’s general minimum wage would increase to 465.60 pesos per day and 701.41 pesos per day in Mexico’s northern border region.[13][14] This is the equivalent of earning $25.22 and $37.99 daily in the U.S. today.[5] 

Raising the minimum wage is critical for Mexico’s “informal workers,” which are employees who work jobs that do not require many skills–such as formal education or extensive training–and are not taxed or subject to government supervision.[12]  In essence, this is akin to freelance work, only it is crucial for many households.[2][6] 

Given what is known about the nature of informal work, increasing the minimum wage during Sheinbaum’s term would benefit women significantly. Informal work is historically pervasive among women in Mexico.[2] Recently, it was estimated that 56% of women are informal workers.[6] Additionally, informal work is less likely to be voluntary for women than men.[2] This is due to the fact that cutbacks in public sector jobs and lower wages for men force women–particularly those who are older or less educated–into the informal workforce in an effort to supplement and diversify family income.[2] Not only is involuntary work underpaid, but women who are either self-employed and work independently or self-employed while employing other workers still earn considerably less wages than women who are formally employed.[2] The higher market value set on labor due to an increased minimum wage can have the effect of not only increasing income for women who work informally, but also improving standards for those who work formally and women who are self-employed.

Formalizing Informal Labor 

On top of informal workers not having labor rights or protection, they also are often not granted social security, pension plans, insurance, access to health care, or paid time off.[12] Informal workers make up 54.5% of Mexico’s workforce.[6] While experts have recommended changing this to allow for growth, there has been a dearth of efforts to actually formalize labor.[7]

Sheinbaum plans to change this by formalizing informal work.[3] This means expanding social security so that it is accessible to informal workers, which can incentivize informal workers to apply to roles which may grant them many benefits which were previously only available to those who work in formal roles.[3] Given that women are the most precarious members of the informal workforce, having social benefits improves prospects in regards to meeting their personal needs.[2] 

Offering Pensions

Many older Mexicans cannot retire because they lack retirement savings.[12] Sheinbaum intends to mitigate the issues associated with retirement by providing a partial pension to women ages 60 to 64, equivalent to half of that administered to those 65 and older.[9] This helps assuage financial burden and stress for women who otherwise would be dependent on their spouse, children, or extended family to assist them in older age as their needs may grow. Needless to say, bolstering retirement for women through pensions is one example of the many social benefits that can transform the lives of women at different stages of life. 

Takeaways

Sheinbaum trailblazed her way to becoming the first woman elected as president in Mexico’s 200 year history.[11] Multiple policy focuses in her strategic policy agenda, “100 Steps for Transformation,” can advance the way women grow economically and socially.[13] By increasing minimum wage, formalizing freelance work, and expanding pensions, Sheinbaum has the potential to increase standard of living for informal working women, formally working women, self-employed women, and older women who are susceptible to financial hardship. While promising, Sheinbaum’s plan should be enacted as soon as possible to realize the economic freedom Sheinbaum seeks to cultivate for women from all walks of life. 


Is the Literary Industry Racially Diverse?

Is the Literary Industry Racially Diverse?

Gabriela Castro 
July 2024

Did you know that 95% of fiction books published in the U.S. between 1950 and 2018 were written by white authors?[7] Considering the fact that 10.5% of the U.S. population were minorities in 1950 and that percentage has only increased in the years since, this shows a historical underrepresentation of authors of color in literature.[3][4]

Contemporary BIPOC Authors are Persistently Underrepresented

Needless to say, efforts to understand and address the racial disparity of authored works have been sluggish. Only two of the infamous Big Five publishing houses–which control over 80% of the publishing market–have just begun to show transparency in surveying the diversity of its authors.[7] Penguin Random House–arguably the biggest literary publishing conglomerate–published a survey review which found that 23.5% of its authors who published between 2019 and 2021 were people of color.[7] By comparison, in 2022 Hachette publishing disclosed its third annual report on diversity that 34% of book acquisitions were written by minority authors in 2021, an increase from 29% in 2020, and 22% in 2019.[7] Considering the fact that racial minorities make up about 40% of the U.S. population, this shows a persistent underrepresentation of authors of color in literature despite recent efforts by these two literary publishing agencies to amplify and publish BIPOC writers.[4]

Image by vecstock on Freepik

Pervasiveness of Whiteness in Publishing

A review of the literary agencies demonstrates that this diversity issue isn’t limited to authors. According to Lee and Low, approximately 72.5% of publishing, review journal, and literary agency staff are white.[5] While this report noted a moderate improvement from the 79% of publishing, review journal, and literary agency staff who identified as white in 2015, this data is misleading as minorities make up a 63.8% majority of literary interns but hold less than 30% of executive, editorial, sales, marketing, book reviewing, literary specialist, and literary agent positions.[5] It is dubious to claim that diversity in publishing has truly improved if minorities are holding the majority of entry-level literary positions but are lacking in associate positions or higher.

Not only are writers of color historically and persistently marginalized in the literary industry, but this disenfranchisement is pervasive in the staffing of those involved in the publishing industry. To underscore this issue, the vast majority of literary employees are straight (68.7%), nondisabled (83.5%), and/or cis women (71.3%), highlighting the need for LGBT+, disabled, and gender nonbinary personnel in the literary industry.[5] 

Representation in Literary Content

Among youth-centered literature, recently published books themselves have diversity on par with the population. In 2023, the Cooperative Children’s Book Center (CCBC) found 40% of total books for children and teens have at least one BIPOC primary character (fiction) or human subject (nonfiction).[8] This is also considering the fact that many published books may not include human characters or subjects since they are imaginative and intended for kids.[8] In terms of content, the CCBC noted that 49% of the children and YA books had significant BIPOC content, an increase from 46% in 2022.[8] 


The caveat to diversity in children’s and teen’s books is that it comes in the wake of scrutiny and pushback in the form of book bans.[6] While it is important to be critical of media consumption, especially for the safety of children, the drastic extent of book censorship can create an overly sanitized and homogenized selection of literature for readers to choose from. 

These book bans can hinder critical thought from young readers by preventing children’s exposure to an identity they would not otherwise understand outside of verbal opinion. In other words, banning books on the basis of them being “too diverse” or controversial leaves children susceptible to others’ bias and unable to form opinions of their own. Denying access to books that address social issues such as racism, sexism, or discrimination leaves children and readers in general liable to internalize and perpetuate stereotypes they hear or witness elsewhere. This can be mitigated by reading books related with various social transgressions. Books that are related to real-life issues can give children examples of ways people interact with each other that are not positive, or healthy. Such books can be used as lessons for children to learn how to productively and prosocially interact with others. This is supported by the fact that reading fiction books fosters empathy.[2] Giving children access to them the faculties and compassion to live inclusively with others. 

Additionally, readers from all backgrounds, but especially marginalized backgrounds, can benefit from being immersed in literature that focuses on characters both like and unlike themselves. Having more diverse authors allows room for more diverse experiences and creative stories. This way, young readers are exposed to literature written by authors who know from experience that they are not a monolith, but complex individuals with unique backgrounds, invaluable cultural backgrounds, worthy of being seen as they are and in places beyond their imagination.[1] It is important to inspire future leaders and adults of tomorrow.

Conclusion

To summarize, the vast majority of books published in the US have historically been written by white authors.[3][7] Not only have publishing agencies been reluctant to publish author demographics, but these disparities persist despite efforts by publishers to close such gaps.[4][7] The majority of staff in the literary publishing industry are white, cisgender, women, straight, and non-disabled, with racial minorities being concentrated in entry-level positions.[5] While we see a significant uptick in children’s books written by POC writers, these have equally been challenged by book bans in school districts across the country.[6][8] These book bans prevent children from learning about social isues, dismantling social issues in their own day-to-day lives, and simply seeing themselves or their peers represented in the literature they consume.[1][2] It is imperative to address obstacles to diversity in publishing because it is important for consumers and publishers of literature to see themselves in literary contexts and for people to practice the golden rule–-treating others how they would like to be treated.[1][2] 


Portrayal of Women in Netflix’s Bridgerton

Portrayal of Women in Netflix’s Bridgerton

Tanvir Bhamra

July 2024

In recent years, shows with female leads have grown popular, often aiming to showcase strong, powerful women. Essentially attempting to erase any femininity from shows, an example being Fate: The Winx Saga; a teen series adapted from a popular kids animation, Winx Club, which originally depicted strong women who embraced their femininity as guardians of their fairy world, whereas the live-action adaption took a different turn, scrapping most of its femininity and original message. On the other hand, shows like Bridgerton started to show women not only in all shapes and sizes but personalities as well. Whether they were more or less feminine, they still had their own strengths and weaknesses. 

Image by freepik

With lead women like Daphne Bridgerton and Kate Sharma, it is clearly shown that both women are capable of being robust, while also embracing their femininity. Daphne, with her grace and determination, and Kate, with her boldness and intelligence, both highlight the multifaceted nature of female strength. 

This approach contrasts with shows such as Fate: The Winx Saga where the emphasis seems to have shifted from the colorful, vibrant representation of femininity which was found in the original series. “But by rejecting the aesthetic and vibe of its source material entirely for a pale imitation of other YA [Young Adult] properties, “Fate: The Winx Saga” might just end up slipping through the cracks[2].”The live adaptation has been heavily criticized for its opposite representation, as shown by the review provided. It emphasizes a darker, more somber tone, which some argue: strips away what made the original show appealing to children. 

However, Bridgerton still highlights the rebellious nature of teens such as Eloise Bridgerton. Eloise, well known for her sharp wit and yearning for independence, challenges the societal expectations of the Regency era and its standards for women. She seeks intellectual fulfillment, often questioning the need for marriage; in her case, Eloise finds safety in her femininity after the fallout with Penelope. In other words, Bridgerton portrays that not all femininity is true to the person.  

Although Penelope Featherington is the same age and shares similar ideologies as Eloise, she uses her femininity to embrace her growth as a woman instead of wallowing in her mother’s tastes. Her ability to embrace her femininity on her own terms emphasizes her strength and resilience in the world of Regency London. 

Bridgerton contributes to a richer, more inclusive representation of women on screen, encouraging viewers to appreciate the many forms of female strength. This trend applies to shows like The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, featuring a woman thriving in a male-dominated field while staying true to her identity, and My Lady Jane, featuring strong female characters navigating romance and societal expectations with wit and resilience in a historical fantasy setting. Overall, Bridgerton successfully balances the portrayal of women by acknowledging their vulnerabilities and showcasing their growth and resilience throughout their stories. 


The Fight for Girls’ Education Everywhere 

The Fight for Girls’ Education Everywhere

Roma Bhavsar 
July 2024

Gender disparity in education 

Access to education is a basic human right that every woman should have access to. Despite clear evidence showing how important girls’ education is for progress and growth, differences between boys’ and girls’ education continue to exist and girls are still being denied their right to a quality education. There is still a lot of work to be done globally to achieve equal education for all despite the barriers that exist among countries and communities. While countries have pledged to provide education for every child, less than half of all countries worldwide have achieved gender equality in primary education. [1] 

Image by freepik

According to UNICEF, globally over 129 million girls are not attending school. This translates to 32 million girls in primary school, 30 million in lower-secondary, and 67 million in upper secondary not receiving education. Girls in conflict-affected countries are over twice as likely to be out of school compared to those in peaceful countries. Only 49% of countries have gender parity in primary education. This number drops to 42% for lower-secondary and 24% for upper-secondary education. [1] Furthermore, as of 2024, Afghanistan is the only country where women and girls face restrictions on education. They are banned from education beyond primary school (sixth grade). It is reported that this ban impacts over one million girls in  Afghanistan. [2] 

Obstacles that exacerbate the education gap between girls and boys 

Various obstacles and barriers prevent girls from getting an education or a proper one, and these challenges differ from one country and community to another. Gender stereotypes that confine women to gender-normative family roles create significant barriers to girls getting a good education. Society often expects girls to take on domestic duties such as cooking and cleaning,  assuming they will rely on men financially. This stereotype also means boys’ education is often seen as more important because they’re expected to be the sole earners for the household. [3, 4] 

Laws and policies in many countries also hinder girls’ education rights. Even rules that seem fair often end up excluding girls because of socially adopted norms. For example, some laws allow child marriages or state that pregnant girls cannot attend school. This restricts girls’ freedom and keeps them from getting an education. Additionally, those who marry at a young age are more likely to drop out of school or complete fewer years of education. According to a 2017 report, more than 41,000 girls are married each day. To put this into perspective, ending child marriage could lead to attaining higher education, earning high wages, and can generate more than 500 billion in benefits each year. [3, 4] 

Furthermore, financial problems and poverty keep girls from going to school. Poor families often cannot pay for things like school fees or uniforms. Parents might also prioritize boys’ education,  thinking it will give them better jobs. When schools are far away from home, especially in rural areas, girls have an even harder time attending. They might have to do household chores like getting water or childcare, which can keep them out of school. [3, 4] 

Violence plays a big role in girls not completing their education. In countries affected by conflict, fragility, and violence, the education gap is much wider. Girls in these countries are 2.5  times more likely to be out of school than boys. At the secondary education level, girls are 90%  more likely to be out of school compared to those in more stable countries. In addition, data shows that girls face the risk of being sexually assaulted when just walking to school. What’s more troubling, pregnancies resulting from assault or violence compound this problem.  Unfortunately, pregnant girls often face stigma and discrimination causing many girls to drop out of school and not return. [3, 4] 

What does this all mean? 

Quality education is a necessity that fosters numerous benefits not just for girls but for their families and communities. As a society, we must invest in girls’ education because women help lift economies in addition to promoting gender equality and building healthier communities. [5] Denying girls and vulnerable groups’ education is a severe form of discrimination that limits an individual’s ability to succeed and build prosperity for entire countries. 

Malala Fund, Too Young to Wed, Mercy Beyond Borders, and WomenOne are just a few of countless nonprofit organizations, support programs, and charities that work to promote girls’  education, help low-income families cover schooling costs, and provide girls the tools they need to take control of their lives. 

We must use our voices to promote education and eliminate the continuing disparities that prevent universal access to education such as systemic inequalities, oppression, and discrimination. Education is vital for learning about the world we live in and every effort should be made to empower girls to write their own stories rather than having others write them for them.  


The Most Underrated Woman Scientist in Germany: The Legacy of Maria Goeppert Mayer

The Most Underrated Woman Scientist in Germany: The Legacy of Maria Goeppert Mayer

Unnati Shekhar
July 2024

Max Planck and Albert Einstein are two of the most prominent names in the pantheon of German great scientists. But Maria Goeppert Mayer is a name that ought to be far more well-known. Mayer was a theoretical physicist who won a Nobel Prize for her innovative work, yet women’s contributions to science are sometimes overlooked in favour of their male peers. Nonetheless, her contributions to the nuclear shell model have had a significant influence on our comprehension of nuclear physics and atomic structure.

Image by freepik

On June 28, 1906, Maria Goeppert Mayer was born in Kattowitz, which was then a part of Germany (now Katowice, Poland). Her father was a pediatrics professor, so she grew up surrounded by academics and had a strong regard for learning early on. Maria’s early affinity for science and maths led her to study physics at the University of Göttingen, where she was taught by Nobel laureate Max Born to finish her Ph.D.

Goeppert Mayer had several challenges because of her gender, even though she was clearly talented and passionate. It was quite uncommon for women to have academic positions in the sciences at that time. She relocated to the US after marrying American scientist Joseph Mayer, but despite her credentials, she had trouble getting hired as a salaried scholar. She spent several years teaching part-time or as a volunteer at a number of universities, including Columbia and Johns Hopkins.

The most important contributions to physics were made by Goeppert Mayer while she was an unpaid employee at the University of Chicago. She created the nuclear shell model in 1948, which clarifies why specific nucleon counts—the protons and neutrons that make up an atomic nucleus—lead to especially stable configurations. The idea of “magic numbers,” or particular numbers of nucleons that form whole shells within the nucleus and contribute to atomic stability, was first proposed by this model. Her study was a significant advancement in the field of nuclear physics and offered a clear explanation for the patterns in nuclear stability that had been discovered.

At first, Goeppert Mayer’s theory was viewed with suspicion. The notion that nucleons may form shells akin to atoms’ electron shells was groundbreaking and contradicted accepted nuclear models. Nonetheless, the scientific world quickly came to accept her predictions due to their accuracy. She shared the 1963 Nobel Prize in Physics with J. Hans D. Jensen, who had created a comparable model on his own. She became the second woman, after Marie Curie, to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics as a result of this acknowledgment.

Even with her impressive accomplishments, Maria Goeppert Mayer’s impact is not widely recognized by the general public. There are multiple factors that contribute to this lack of clarity. Initially, her contributions to theoretical physics are groundbreaking, but they are intricate and not as easily understandable to the general public as the work of other scientists from the same time period. Also, the gender prejudices during that era frequently led to her successes being minimized or credited to her male peers. In addition, Goeppert Mayer had a humble and understated demeanor, and she did not actively pursue attention, opting instead to allow her research to shine on its own. This modesty, though commendable, also added to her lack of recognition in a field where promoting oneself can boost one’s reputation.

Recently, there has been an increasing effort to acknowledge the impact of women in the field of science, with Maria Goeppert Mayer’s narrative being emphasized more as a testament to determination and intelligence despite facing challenges. Her legacy proves that genuine scientific brilliance is not limited by gender and that women scientists’ contributions should be acknowledged equally.By exploring and honoring the achievements of trailblazers such as Maria Goeppert Mayer, we not only pay tribute to their legacy but also motivate upcoming scientists, regardless of gender, to follow their dreams with determination and perseverance.

The life and work of Maria Goeppert Mayer serve as a reminder that the journey to scientific breakthroughs is frequently difficult, yet it is these obstacles that enhance the significance of the achievements. She serves as a source of motivation, not only for females in the science field, but also for individuals willing to challenge the limits of human understanding.


The Feminism Effect: How The Art Movement Underscores The Power of Women 

The Feminism Effect: How The Art Movement Underscores The Power of Women 

Yashaswini Repaka 
August 2024

Art speaks volumes. It can encompass many aspects of our daily lives, and urge us to understand how powerful our emotions are through variation. Like the power of a simple brush stroke, feminism throughout modern works encompasses the power of representation, power dynamics, and the identity of the female community. Advocating for the empowerment of women and marginalized groups, feminist art brings together a vibrant community and unites women in girlhood. The feminist movement has significantly shaped contemporary art and continues to impact the art field today, empowering women in every aspect of life.

Image by freepik

Emerging in the late 1960’s and 70’s, the feminist art movement was a response to a predominantly male-centric art world. It sought to address issues of gender equality and challenge traditional notions of art. As once stated by female artist Suzanne Lacy, “…the goal of Feminist Art was to “influence cultural attitudes and transform stereotypes.”[1] 

Examples of more renowned female artists include Judy Chicago and Miriam Schapiro, spotlighted in the following:

Inspired by the women’s movement and rebelling against the male-dominated scene of their art world, many renowned paintings such as the Dinner Party [1979] which Chicago described as “a reinterpretation of The Last Supper from the point of view of women, who, throughout history, have prepared the meals and set the table” [4]. The Dinner Party celebrated the forgotten achievements of women throughout history. The main focus of the piece is a table with symbolic places for thirty-nine “guests of honor.” Each place setting describes each woman’s achievement. Incorporating elements of a social event with the status and appearance of a banquet, Chicago elevates her guests to the role of heroes, a traditionally male characteristic.

Another renowned piece by Schapiro, DollHouse [1972], which was intended to be a statement on the lives of women and the fact that “there is more to be discovered beyond the female stereotype and opportunities for her to choose to be sexual or glamorous” [5]. The Dollhouse describes how a woman is portrayed on the outside, but if someone got to know them a little better, or “opened the doors of the house”, they would understand her hobbies and personality. Especially in the 20th century, many societal norms looked down upon women making their own choices. So, just like the shutters in the house, it is demonstrated that women have the ability to close or open parts of their lives to other individuals.

Gender equality, racial justice, LGBTQ rights, and other social justice movements often intersect with feminist art. Many artists use their work to shed light on these issues, using their platforms to advocate for change and amplify marginalized voices. For example, American Gothic by Grant Wood reflects concerns about rural life and the rigidity of gender roles[6]. Harlem by Langston Hughes delves into the experience of African Americans in the early 20th century, addressing themes of race and class[2]. Brokeback Mountain directed by Ang Lee portrays a complex and poignant exploration of homosexuality, along with themes of love, identity, and societal expectations [3]. 

All in all, feminism has played a crucial role in reshaping the art world, challenging traditional norms, and amplifying the voices of women artists. From the feminist art movement of the 1960s and 1970s to the present day, the influence of feminism on art continues to be profound. The feminist art movement has inspired gender, identity, and power dynamics, ultimately enriching and diversifying the artistic landscape. Through these powerful works of art, women across the world feel empowered by the rich intricacies and powerful, emotional advocacy. All it took was a paint jar and a burning passion to represent. 


Female Genital Mutilation: The Silent Crisis

Female Genital Mutilation: The Silent Crisis

Pooja Bhavsar

August 2024

More than 230 million women alive today have undergone Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) [4]. Deep-rooted in gender inequalities and misogynistic ideologies, the practice is a significant violation of women’s right to health, privacy, and physical integrity. It involves any and all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons [4].  It has no health benefit for the women involved, but rather a cause for severe bleeding and problems urinating. These complications can later develop into cysts, infections, as well as complications in childbirth and increased risk of newborn deaths [4]. These procedures are practiced in 92 countries, 51 of which have laws specifically prohibiting FGM [2]

Image by freepik

FMG is split into four different classifications. Type 1 is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans [4]. Type 2 is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans as well as the labia minora [4]. Type 3 can also be known as infibulation. It is the narrowing of the vaginal opening through the creation of a covering seal. This seal is created by cutting and repositioning the labia minora, or labia majora, sometimes through stitching [4]. This can be done with or without removal of the clitoral hood and glans. The last classification is Type 4, which includes all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes like pricking, piercing and incising the genital area [4]. A procedure falling into any of these classifications can lead to debilitating health complications.

There are a variety of medical issues that can arise from FGM, ranging from immediate to long-term problems. The more invasive the FGM procedure, the more severe the repercussions. Some instantaneous ramifications include hemorrhaging, wound healing problems, shock, fever and in some cases, even death [4]. Longer-lasting consequences include increased risk of childbirth difficulties, psychological issues, keloid, urinary problems, menstruation problems etc [4]. These procedures are typically completed by healthcare providers, who know the dangerous aftermath of these procedures. So why do many of them continue to practice these procedures?

FGM takes place among indigenous and/or diaspora communities in numerous countries globally, typically performed on girls ages 0 to 15 [1]. Often in these communities, there is a cultural belief that FGM will ensure a girl’s proper upbringing, preserve family honor, and/or make a girl suitable for marriage [1]. This ultimately is centered around controlling the girl’s sexuality, and protecting her virginity to promote purity and marital fidelity. Individuals who belong to these communities are frequently faced with pressures from other community members, which can lead to coercion, perpetuating the practice further.

FGM has received opposition globally, with many organizations trying to bring an end to the invasive procedure. UNICEF and UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) have been working together since 2008, leading the world’s largest program to end FGM. The UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation, works with community members to raise awareness of FGM’s harms as well as works with governments for the development of policy against FGM [3]. For girls at risk and/or affected by FGM, UNICEF provides them with medical and psychological care. Since the establishment of the program, 13 countries have passed national legislation banning FGM [3]. More than 6 million girls and women have received prevention, protection, and treatment services related to FGM and 45 million people have made public declarations to abandon the practice [3].

FGM is a grevious threat to many girls and young women and its eradication is vital. By speaking up, enacting strong legal measures and raising awareness in communities, a future without this risk can become a reality.  Bringing an end to FGM is not just the ending of a destructive practice; it is the restoration of human rights.


4B Movement: Saying No To Men

4B Movement: Saying No To Men

Tanvir Bhamra
May 2024

Korea is known for its rich culture, from its delectable cuisine and captivating architecture to irresistible dramas and K-pop. Yet in the bustling streets of Seoul and beyond, women take a stand for themselves to change feminism in South Korea. Many women in Korea find that, while many other parts of the world are moving towards greater gender equality and human rights, Korea does not match that progressive nature. The severity of violence towards women has drastically increased, involving acts of rape, murder, sexual harassment at work, and domestic abuse[1]. These atrocities are what pushed the women of Korea to take situations into their own hands, thus birthing the 4B Movement. 

Image by freepik

This movement started in 2019, representing women’s complete refusal of their male counterparts with the four B’s: 비혼 (bihon): no marriage, 비출산 (bichulsan): no childbirth, 비연애 (biyeonae): no relationships, and 비섹스 (bisekseu): no sex[2]. This movement is not only directed towards defying men’s disrespect but also the gender-based government they live in, an ultimate symbol of how women are no longer dependent on men like they once were back when they were second-class citizens. 

However, these actions of isolating the ideology of a modern woman and the century-old traditional roles have consequences. One of these is Korea’s declining birthrate, which is also affected by its high living costs and the low wages women receive [3]. The economic and social pressures further fueled the 4B Movement, and the women of Korea have turned to social media apps like TikTok, inspiring other countries to start their own movements[3].

Public opinion on the 4B Movement is sharply divided; Korean women with first-hand experience with dating and gender discrimination are supportive of the movement, while those with more traditional outlooks on life are more skeptical about the matter[2]. Meanwhile, most Korean men are against the whole movement due to their expectations of receiving traditional roles and being accustomed to pampering. Either way, those taking the initiative or supporting the movement often get ridiculed online or in person[2]

The future of the 4B Movement remains uncertain, but its influence is undeniable. As its principles inspire the younger generations, causing more women to join the movement, it drives a shift in social attitudes, challenges the status quo, and advocates for a new vision of womanhood free of systemic oppression. 


To Cast or Not Cast?: The Controversy Surrounding Fan-Casting Live-Action Rapunzel

To Cast or Not Cast?: The Controversy Surrounding Fan-Casting Live-Action Rapunzel

Yashaswini Repaka
May 2024

Avantika Vandanapu, an Indian American actress who played Karen Shetty in the musical adaptation of Mean Girls raised contentions when fan-casted as Rapunzel in the supposed live-action version of Tangled. This rumor has spiraled throughout TikTok’s platform, and Vandanapu became the subject of racist comments. 

No live-action Tangled movie has been confirmed by Disney yet, but eager fan accounts claimed Avantika is a candidate for the role. As a result, TikTok users took the claims seriously: 

Image by freepik

One TikToker posted, “Rapunzel is a GERMAN folk story. Indians are not and never will be German,” (Venkataraman 2024). 

Another post stated, “Rapunzel Is supposed to be a blonde white girl,” (@faithell.iott 2024). 

Avantika also received hate comments in the comment sections of her Instagram posts, stating she wasn’t right for the role and wouldn’t be an authentic Rapunzel. Some also suggested that casting Indian women as Rapunzel would be like casting white actors for the roles of colored princesses such as Mulan and Tiana from Princess and the Frog

Others argue Avantika is well-suited for the role: “tangled is the story of a brown girl. i said what i said,” (@shivaniranaa 2024). 

Another posted, “All this racism and delusions for a movie that doesn’t exist,” (Venkataraman 2024). 

Nevertheless, this news spun into debates regarding race, as many claim this as an instance of South Asian discrimination. 

The origins of the Rapunzel story can be traced back to a rich tapestry of cultural and literary sources. The tale, popularized by the Brothers Grimm, is just one of the many iterations of a motif found in various folk traditions and oral narratives. In the Brothers Grimm adaptation, Rapunzel is depicted as having “splendid long hair, as fine as spun gold,” (Grimm 2019). In the

Disney adaptation of the tale, Rapunzel has emerald green eyes and the same golden hair magical, making it an integral component of the plot and expanding on the original storyline. Rapunzel’s evil stepmother Mother Gothel uses Rapunzel’s magical hair to obtain eternal youth. Interestingly enough, the Persian epic poem “Shahnameh” has a character by the name of Rudaba, who shares many similarities with Rapunzel (a young woman with long hair, confined in a tower) and that “included the first story to feature a woman lowering her hair to allow someone to climb up and gain entry to her home, and is traced back to have likely inspired the Rapunzel fairytale,” (Mohamed, Williams, Fattani 2021). This narrative has been found to extend across many cultures, including the Italian tale of “Petrosinella” by Giambattista Basile, which features Petrosinella, a character with a fate similar to Rapunzel’s: “Words are but wind,” answered the ogress; “I am not to be caught with such prattle; you have closed the balance-sheet of life, unless you promise to give me the child you bring forth, girl or boy, whichever it may be,” (H, Z. 2024). Petrosinella and the modern Rapunzel face the same fate of being taken captive by a witch because her parents had taken plants from that garden. 

Many who oppose Avantika being cast for the role of Rapunzel claim her appearance is not reminiscent of the animated Disney version. Having South Asian roots, Avantika has long, black hair. However, this topic remains up for debate. Many people have expressed concern that the treatment of the South Asian community, in this situation, reflects wider issues of discrimination and prejudice. This incident has sparked important discussions about race relations and the need for greater awareness and understanding of different cultural backgrounds. 

As a result, this minor post by fans has sparked outrage among TikTok users, causing controversies to ripple throughout the social media platform, and has left users contemplating the deeper meanings behind cultural representation.